Fraser Simpson v CPAO litigation update: a must read for all CPA's and litigation lawyers.

This week the CPAO filed a motion to secure costs for the upcoming appeal to be heard this November 26th at Osgoode Hall. I invite everyone to attend and watch me perform my magic. Robert Rueter, or Bob as I like to call him was his usual incompetent dufus self. He spent 3 days and $25,000 on a frivolous motion where merit was previously ruled on by Justice Van Rensburg. Guess he needs the money. Next week we get the decision by Justice Epstein.

To date the clowns at the CPAO have spent in excess of $250,000 defending an action with respect to the payment of my professional fees 6 years ago. Why? Because if they don't they will be liable for negligence and have to cut me a sizable cheque (cash please, large bills).

To all CPA's I invite you to question the executive and question the validity of spending over $250,000 to pursue an action related to a 4,000 professional fee.

Summary of the facts; (details are available on request)

  • Marshall Sone paid my professional fees by credit card in Jan 09
  • Sone (a convicted fraudster and Fog Horn Leg Horn look-a-like) committed credit card fraud and stole the fees from the CPAO I April of 09
  • The CPAO then requested the funds from me which I politely advised them to kiss my ass. They took offense and decided to engage me in a litigation battle instead of reporting the Sone fraud to the appropriate authorities.
  • During litigation it was revealed that the CPAO did not prepare a sales draft for the Sone credit card payment because they, well, forgot. That is what we call in legal circles-NEGLIGENCE.
  • the CRA has provided a ruling in which they validate my professional fees as being paid.
  • the CPAO and Bob have declared the CRA ruling without authority. We shall see what 3 sober judges think come appeal time.
Look for my update next week as we get closer to crunch time and the 11th hour things should get interesting.

Fraser Simpson 647-884-1216

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

When is a fraud a fraud? The Marshall Sone expulsion

Marshall Bryan Sone: Summary, as Published in CheckMark Marshall Bryan Sone , of North York, was found guilty of a charge under Rule 201.1 of failing to maintain the good reputation of the profession and its ability to serve the public interest, arising out of his criminal conviction for fraud. While a trustee in bankruptcy of monies for the benefit of creditors of the bankruptcy estates administered by him, Mr. Sone, with intent to defraud and in contravention of his trust, converted monies to a use not authorized by the trust, contrary to the Criminal Code. He was fined $15,000 and expelled from the Institute. Mr. Sone’s appeal of the discipline committee’s decision and order was dismissed by the appeal committee. CHARGE(S) LAID re Marshall Bryan Sone The Professional Conduct Committee hereby makes the following charges against Marshall Sone, CA, a member of the Institute: 1 THAT, the said Marshall Sone, on or about May 25, 1998, failed to conduct ...
Read more

CRA investigations result in 53.5 years of jail sentences

Tax fraud and evasion represent the most flagrant instances of non-compliance with tax statutes. During 2012-2013, 71 income tax and GST/HST investigations were referred to the Public Prosecution Service of Canada (PPSC) for prosecution, compared to 120 cases in the previous year. As a result of referrals to the PPSC (current and previous years), 128 cases resulted in convictions for tax evasion or fraud in 2012-2013. The courts imposed $9.95 million in fines and 53.5 years of jail sentences. These convictions related to revenue loss of $32.6 million. The CRA obtained convictions in 96% of cases prosecuted. In addition, the Ministère du Revenu du Québec, acting on our behalf, referred 27 GST investigation cases for prosecution and, based on these and previous year referrals, Quebec courts convicted individuals and businesses in 58 cases, and imposed $3.1 million in fines. Quebec GST convictions related to revenue loss of $4.4 million. Court convictions are publicized in local,...
Read more

Penalty for Tax Evasion in Canada

Penalty for Tax Evasion in Canada Most people file their annual return honestly and only take deductions and credits made available by the Income Tax Act. Unfortunately, some individuals and businesses evade taxes, and there are legal consequences for such actions. Anurag Gupta, a Toronto business and tax lawyer with the law firm of Anurag Gupta Professional Corporation, says that evaders may face criminal penalties including jail time and fines up to "200 percent of the amount" that the offender may have been trying to avoid. Ignoring the Law Tax evasion occurs when an individual or business ignores tax laws to avoid paying taxes. The Canada Revenue Agency explains that evaders may report less income than they actually earn or state that their deduction amounts are higher than allowed. If a person earns income not documented by an employer, such as cash or self-employment income, and does not report that income to the CRA on his return, he is committing tax ev...
Read more